Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 19:53:58 11/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 29, 2002 at 01:08:34, Russell Reagan wrote: >On November 28, 2002 at 19:57:54, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>That is where it is "interesting" to work... > >Are computer vs. human games at correspondance time control of any interest to >you? I imagine that a correspondance master would give any computer chess >program a good beating. Imagine Kramnik or Kasparov with days or weeks to decide >upon a move rather than minutes. How much would the computer's play improve at >such a time control? What search depth are we talking about? I'm not particularly interested in such games. The main reason is that testing would be horribly time-consuming compared to normal games. Even 3 mins per move games are slow and it takes a while and a lot of machines to play enough to make any decisions...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.