Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: what does "fail high" mean? In the context of iterative deepening/

Author: Russell Reagan

Date: 11:34:44 11/30/02

Go up one level in this thread

On November 30, 2002 at 12:32:09, scott farrell wrote:

>What if they first searched 3.76-3.77 - just looking for a fail high, that would
>exclude Nf6 and include Nf4 quickly. But it could have been 3.02-3.77, and Nf6
>score dropped below 3.02.

Good observation. I think the latter is more likely. Probably something like
3.03-3.77.

• Re: what does "fail high" mean? In the context of iterative deepening/ scott farrell 17:55:54 11/30/02
  • Re: what does "fail high" mean? In the context of iterative deepening/ Russell Reagan 20:38:44 11/30/02
    • Re: what does "fail high" mean? In the context of iterative deepening/ scott farrell 20:54:31 11/30/02
      • Re: what does "fail high" mean? In the context of iterative deepening/ Russell Reagan 21:25:00 11/30/02
        • Re: what does "fail high" mean? In the context of iterative deepening/ scott farrell 22:06:14 11/30/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.