Author: Martin Giepmans
Date: 16:46:30 11/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 30, 2002 at 16:43:04, Mike S. wrote: >On November 30, 2002 at 16:34:49, Mike S. wrote: > >>>[D]q1k1r2r/1p1b2pp/p1n1p2n/2B1PpN1/3p1P2/P2B3P/P1P3P1/1R2QR1K w - - > >I tried Fritz 7 in multi-pv (2 variations) mode. At first it preferred 1.c3 too, >like Ruffian. At ply 13 it evaluated 1.Rb6 best for the first time, at ply 14 >1.Rb2 is 2nd best now, replacing 1.c3: > >Analysis by Fritz 7: > >1. +- (2.94): 1.Rb6 Rhg8 2.Qa1 Nd8 3.Bxd4 Bc6 4.Qc3 Re7 5.Rfb1 Nhf7 6.Bc5 Rc7 >7.Nxh7 >2. +- (2.78): 1.Rb2 b5 2.a4 b4 3.Qe2 a5 4.Ba6+ Kd8 5.Qb5 Bc8 6.Qb6+ Kd7 7.Bb5 >Bb7 8.Bd6 > >Probably it's not a perfect test position either... no single moves which are >clearly better than alternatives. > Yes, perhaps this demonstrates that problem composers don't have an easy life. But this is nothing compared to the life of a chess pogrammer ;) Martin >Regards, >M.Scheidl
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.