Author: scott farrell
Date: 17:55:54 11/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 30, 2002 at 14:34:44, Russell Reagan wrote: >On November 30, 2002 at 12:32:09, scott farrell wrote: > >>What if they first searched 3.76-3.77 - just looking for a fail high, that would >>exclude Nf6 and include Nf4 quickly. But it could have been 3.02-3.77, and Nf6 >>score dropped below 3.02. > >Good observation. I think the latter is more likely. Probably something like >3.03-3.77. if it was 3.03-3.77 as you suggest, a few things would need to have happened: Nf6 would have needed to fail low Possibly several other moves would have needed to fail low Nf4 failed high So what I am saying is that, for this analysis only, that a wider window would reduce the chance of Nf6 to fail low, and hence why I think it was a narrow/narrower window. Scott
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.