Author: Lanny DiBartolomeo
Date: 21:22:31 09/16/98
Go up one level in this thread
On September 16, 1998 at 21:46:02, Serge Desmarais wrote:
>On September 16, 1998 at 00:49:49, blass uri wrote:
>
>>
>>On September 15, 1998 at 17:54:09, Shaun Graham wrote:
>>
>>
>>>5.Also i might point out humans make bad moves quite frequently even at the GM
>>>level, so if i saw a positional blunder, i wouldn't be thinking my opponent is
>>>playing like a computer, but rather "Yes!! I have a win!!"
>>
>>There are some positional blunders computers do that no GM is going to do
>>The probability for these blunders is small but sometimes computers do not
>>do right evaluation of a pawn ending or do not see an idea of a simple fortress
>>position.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>So ultimately the likelyhood that i would think another opponent especially a GM
>>>was using a computer against me in a tournament or a match is almost zero.
>>
>>There is another way to suspect that the opponent is a computer.
>>You can see that the opponent thinks about obvious moves.
>>
>>Uri
>
>
>You for got one BIG thing : his opponent would ALSO be a GM. Only, the other GM
>would be HELPED (not bypassed!) secretly by a computer. So the second GM
>would/could play obvious moves fast and also ignore stupid positionnal
>suggestion made by the computer?
>
>
>Serge Desmarais
I believe if you Read sentence #4 it rules out the other GM Putting in his own
moves.
Thanks
Lanny
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.