Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 10:32:14 12/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 30, 2002 at 17:08:39, Art Basham wrote: >On November 30, 2002 at 13:43:35, John Merlino wrote: > >>On November 30, 2002 at 13:15:48, Art Basham wrote: >> >>>[D]q1k1r2r/1p1b3p/p1n1p1pn/2B1PpN1/3p1P2/P2B3P/P1P3P1/1R2QR1K w - - >>> >>>sorry for the error ..this is the correct diagram! >> >>CM9000, on a P3-733, sure doesn't see anything wrong with Qh4: >> >>Time Depth Score Positions Moves >>0:00 1/3 1.71 1313 1.Nf3 Rd8 2.Nxd4 Nxd4 3.Bxd4 >>0:00 1/4 1.85 3104 1.Nf3 Rd8 2.Qh4 Nf7 3.Nxd4 Nxd4 >> 4.Bxd4 >>0:00 1/4 2.42 3718 1.Qh4 Ng8 2.Nf7 g5 3.fxg5 >>0:00 1/5 2.42 5970 1.Qh4 Ng8 2.Nf7 g5 3.fxg5 >>0:00 1/6 4.48 21047 1.Qh4 Ng4 2.hxg4 h6 3.Nf7 g5 4.fxg5 >>0:01 1/7 4.46 87742 1.Qh4 Ng4 2.hxg4 h6 3.Nf7 g5 4.fxg5 >> hxg5 5.Qxh8 Rxh8+ 6.Nxh8 Nxe5 7.Bxd4 >> Nxg4 >>0:04 1/8 5.04 232545 1.Qh4 Ne7 2.Qxh6 Bc6 3.Bxd4 b5 >> 4.Rf2 Bd5 5.Nxh7 Bxa2 >>0:08 1/9 4.65 517663 1.Qh4 b5 2.Qxh6 Nd8 3.Bxd4 Qd5 >> 4.Nf3 Nc6 5.Bb6 Qxa2 >>0:15 1/10 4.92 1059208 1.Qh4 b5 2.Qxh6 Nd8 3.Bxd4 Bc6 >> 4.Nf3 Qb7 5.Bc5 Be4 6.Rbe1 >>0:36 2/11 4.63 2452112 1.Qh4 b5 2.Qxh6 Nd8 3.Bxd4 Qd5 >> 4.Be3 Bc6 5.Nf3 Qxa2 6.Rb3 Bxf3 >> 7.gxf3 >>1:36 3/12 4.81 7308529 1.Qh4 b5 2.Qxh6 Nd8 3.Bxd4 Qd5 >> 4.Be3 Bc6 5.Nf3 Qxa2 6.Ra1 Qb2 >> 7.Bd4 >> >>Could you post the whole game? > > > >Hi John.. >Sure..Here it the complete game... > > > >ChessRobot (1415) - Tunroc (1465) [A02] >Rated game, 15m + 0s Main Playing Hall, 30.11.2002 > >1.f4 e6 2.Nf3 d5 3.d4 c5 4.e3 Nc6 5.Bb5 Bd7 6.0-0 a6 7.Bd3 Qb6 8.dxc5 Bxc5 9.Qe1 >d4 10.e4 Nh6 11.h3 0-0-0 12.Kh1 Rde8 13.Na3 Bxa3 14.bxa3 f5 15.e5 g6 16.Bd2 Qa7 >17.Rb1 Kd8 18.Ng5 Ref8 19.Ba5+ Kc8 20.Bb6 Qa8 21.Bc5 Re8 22.Rb6 Kc7 23.Qb1 Kc8 >24.Bd6 Nd8 25.Bxa6 Bc6 26.Bb5 Bxb5 27.Qxb5 Nc6 28.Rb1 Nd8 29.Qc4+ Kd7 Tunroc >abandonne (Lag: Av=0.82s, max=1.5s)[29...Nc6 30.Nxe6 Qa5 31.Rxc6+ bxc6 32.Qxc6+ >Qc7 33.Qxc7#] 1-0 > >The way I see it... >Most computers will play Qa4 (of course a very good move) where I played Rb6... > >That is because computers still lack "imagination" and still cannot make a >"plan" for a winning position here...:-) Well, Qh4 seems to win significant material and thus the game, so you can't fault any program (or person) for playing it IMHO! >regards >Art >> >>jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.