Author: blass uri
Date: 03:59:28 09/17/98
Go up one level in this thread
On September 17, 1998 at 06:16:44, Jouni Uski wrote: >I only tried to warn You, that You should take Thorten's posts with >reservations. He has been Cstal supporter previously. And now Selective Search >ratinglist puts Cstal about 200 points behind Fritz5 - e.g. with 100.0000 % >safety F5 is stronger. > >Jouni I believe to thordten's results After I saw the probabilities in the opening book of Fritz5 I am convinced that he did not cheat with the book you cannot say that with 100% F5 stronger in his machines because of the following factors 1)He does not use the commercial Cstal but better version of Cstal 2)Fritz5 does not love K6/200 and love more pentium200MMX (Fritz5 is 20-30% slower because of this reason). 3)The results of Fritz5 in the selective search based on matches and fritz5 is better in a match against the same opponent than in a tournament when it plays only one game against every opponent. I ask the ssdf list producers to give a list based on at most 2 games between every 2 opponents with different colours Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.