Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Dual AMD v Intel Was Re: Here is the comparison !

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 10:28:42 12/02/02

Go up one level in this thread


On December 02, 2002 at 04:33:46, David Rasmussen wrote:

>On December 01, 2002 at 22:24:39, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>Actually that did not happen.  Crafty was initially developed on a cray.
>>A real 64 bit machine.  With more bandwidth in one processor than a roomfull
>>of PCs...
>
>I know that, that's why I wrote "(in the x86 world)". We're talking about the
>x86 architecture here. And the way you have dealt with that architecture in
>regard to Crafty, is to use Intel chips as long as I can remember. You have a
>quad xeon which you are very happy with. When it comes to x86, Crafty has been
>most extensively tested on that machine, I gather. And of course it shows.
>
>/David


The complete history of Crafty goes like this:

Started on the Cray.

Moved to a sun UltraSparc

Later to a pentium/133

Then to a pentium-pro which was light-years beyond any competitor

Then on to the xeon 400, 550 and (at present 700) although it has been run on
the
AMD machines quite a bit, as the last WMCCC we competed in used a dual AMD.

It will eventually run on a dual 2.8 xeon some or all of the time also...




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.