Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 02:48:35 12/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
new tests come, new tests go. nobody and nothing is perfect, and often the test is not measuring what it should. it can only be an additional help, no reason to attack the makers. it's IMO a question HOW you interpret the data. Gurevitch and Meiler made a good job. I doubt that they ever said: we are doing a perfect job ! most often the chess magazin that publishes the test tries to transport the test into heaven... to increase the fame on both sides. so eduard, it's IMO not a big deal. test suites come and go, remember: Bratko-Kopec, Colditz-test BT2450 ...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.