Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: 2 GHz Celeron vs. 2 GHz Pentium IV question. In re of Gateway 300S deal

Author: Aaron Gordon

Date: 13:06:01 12/04/02

Go up one level in this thread


On December 04, 2002 at 14:20:05, J. C. Boco wrote:

>http://www.gateway.com/home/products/hm_dtp_300.shtml
>
>The above is a repost (which I first learned about a few messages down) on a
>great deal for a computer with a Flat Panel LCD Display (drool) for $699.
>Probably $799 with shipping.
>
>What a deal!!!!!  I never thought the flat-panels would break the $899 barrier
>(shipping included) for at least a year.  But what do I know?  Anyway...
>
>The only drawback is the Celeron processor.  Has anyone run a test which has
>given them insight into the Celeron/Pentium 4 comparison?
>
>How much faster would a Pentium 4 be than a Celeron, given the same clock speed
>(2GHz?  If the answer is "not that much", then oh man what a deal this computer
>would be.

As far as Chess goes there shouldn't be too big of a difference. For other
applications though the P4 is *MUCH* faster MHz for MHz than the new P4-cored
Celerons. Even an old Celeron 1.3GHz (P3 core) and Duron 1.3GHz can beat a
Celeron 1.7GHz (P4 core) overclocked to 2.26GHz.

http://www.tech-report.com/reviews/2002q3/celeron-1.7/index.x?pg=1
http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1622&p=9

Here are two reviews of the Celeron 1.7GHz. As you can see it is
a waste of money as much faster processors are available for less money.

Celeron 2.0GHz = $87
AthlonXP 2100+ = $87

As far as chess goes an AthlonXP 2100+ is pretty close if not on par with a
P4-2.8GHz.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.