Author: Bernhard Bauer
Date: 07:22:59 12/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 05, 2002 at 10:10:30, Wayne Lowrance wrote: >On December 05, 2002 at 08:55:23, Bernhard Bauer wrote: > >Howdy, I disagree with you to a degree. To those hundreds (thousands ?) who >purchase a Computer Chess program looking for a improvement against other >programs will be dissapointed, reports have been posted here already reporting >no improvement, making same move as it's predessor etc. What do you mean by *improvement*? If Fritz(x) solves some type of position which Fritz(x-1) didn't solve it is an improvement. Your dissapointment can only mean that you expected something else. What? Eduard showed that Fritz(x) makes some other moves than Fritz(x-1). >>Better graphics etc is not enough for a new release, IMHO. > Why not? regards Bernhard >Thanks > >Wayne > >PS I think that the many testers who post here tournament results against other >programs are not to thrilled either to test another new release that plays no >better. > > > >>On December 05, 2002 at 07:15:24, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>Hi Eduard >>>Wrong title: nullmove heuristic of Fritz8 being much better than with Fritz7 >>>does not necessarly mean that Fritz8 is that much stronger. >>>Kurt >> >>I disagree. >>If Eduard is right, Fritz8 is much better than Fritz7. >>Much better in a lot of positions. >>Poor people who can only think in terms of SSDF-Elo points. >>Kind regards >>Bernhard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.