Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why it should be worth to obtain N-best-trees!

Author: Bob Durrett

Date: 16:08:21 12/05/02

Go up one level in this thread


On December 05, 2002 at 18:02:23, Robert Hyatt wrote:

<snip>

>The idea was to search multiple root moves in parallel.  Of course you are
>correct in that there is no way to really know anything without having done
>it already.  My approach (in annotating games) has been to search all moves and
>get the best, then remove it from the set and search again to get second-best.
>Repeat
>until either tired or done.  :)
>
<snip>

Do you assert that there is no other approach?  [a "loaded" question]

Bob D.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.