Author: Bob Durrett
Date: 17:44:07 12/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 05, 2002 at 20:05:30, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On December 05, 2002 at 17:32:13, Bob Durrett wrote: > <snip> >>I'm not clear what you mean when you say "Positional >>Position." [Also, what is it, exactly, that is "impossible"?] > >Example, a position without tactics, meaning without ordinary eval advantages. <snip> Well, maybe we need help from the chess programmers on this one. I do not know what "ordinary eval advantages" would be. Perhaps is depends on the chess engine. One engine might ordinarily identify certain kinds of advantages and another chess engine might ordinarily identify a different set of kinds of advantages. I prefer to give the chess engine programmers the benefit of the doubt on this one. They probably have done a lot of work in making their position evaluation code work well with a wide range of position types. But I'm just guessing, of course. : ) Bob D.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.