Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 23:45:16 12/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 05, 2002 at 17:59:37, Lei , Shiann-Tzong wrote: >On December 05, 2002 at 16:53:06, Pavel Blokhine wrote: > >>On December 05, 2002 at 16:43:45, Dave Gomboc wrote: >> >>>On December 05, 2002 at 15:36:28, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>It is time for the SSDF to get rid off their Old K6 450 Mhz and start using only >>>>their current AMD 1.2 Ghz and XP 2600+ to evaluate their programs. >>>> >>>>Pichard. >>> >>>Nah, the 1200 is good enough until the 64-bitters come out next year. :-) >> >>>Dave The problem would be that most programs would NOT take advantage of the 64-Bitter, since it would take at least another two years to convert at least 75% of the programs to run on 64. Therefore, to use the ClawHammer next year would be the same as using a fast 32 bitters. Pichard. >> >>Would the 64-bitters be the most powerfull computer in the market? If so, how >>so? More powerfull than a dual Penthium Xeon 2.8 Ghz? > >In some test , the benchmark of ClawHammer (Athlon 64 ) 800Mhz is strong than >Xeon 2.2 Ghz ! >It's really , 800Mhz strong than 2200Mhz ! > >Ansys 7.0 test >====================================================== >ClawHammer 800MHz¡A memory 512MB¡AWindows XP Pro >IC35L060AVER07-0 1 1 > >score : 276.219 302.000 >------------------------------------------------------ >Pentium4 Xeon 2200MHz , memory 1GB¡AWindows 2000 Pro >COMPAQPC MAN3184MP 2 1 > >score : 211.781 251.000 >=======================================================
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.