Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: How Does the Typical Chess Engine Solve Non-Tactical Positions?

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 06:34:16 12/06/02

Go up one level in this thread

On December 06, 2002 at 08:52:41, Bob Durrett wrote:

>Ingo:
>
>Your discussion of tactical versus positional is very insightful.  Your ideas
>are closer to the problems chess programmers actually face when trying to make
>their engines do well with non-tactical positions.
>
>I would like to see more information about the different programming methods
>chess programmers have used to make their engines do well in non-tactical
>positions.  Your discussion gives some insight in your approach.  Also, your
>comments may be useful to programmers who are looking for a better way to solve
>this problem.
>
>Bob D.

Improvement in search rules can help also in non tactical positions.
Searching deeper helps also when there is no combination.

Uri

• Ignorant Question: What are "Search Rules"? Bob Durrett 06:58:06 12/06/02
  • Re: Ignorant Question: What are "Search Rules"? Uri Blass 07:27:44 12/06/02
    • Re: Ignorant Question: What are "Search Rules"? Bob Durrett 07:54:32 12/06/02
      • Re: Ignorant Question: What are "Search Rules"? Uri Blass 08:51:32 12/06/02
        • Re: Ignorant Question: What are "Search Rules"? Bob Durrett 09:23:21 12/06/02
          • Re: Ignorant Question: What are "Search Rules"? Uri Blass 09:54:12 12/06/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.