Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 07:31:54 12/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 06, 2002 at 10:24:22, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On December 06, 2002 at 07:14:29, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On December 06, 2002 at 05:40:25, Matt Taylor wrote: >> >>>On December 06, 2002 at 05:09:03, Daniel Clausen wrote: >>> >>>>http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=6586 >>>> >>>>I love marketing. :) >>>> >>>>Sargon >>> >>>Offhand I would have said the one on the left was a Williamette. ;) >>>Then again, Intel claimed that both chips had HT. >>> >>>The only thing I can figure is that someone made a big typo. >>> >>>-Matt >> >>Test results provided by Robert Hyatt i see in small font right bottom :) > > >What are you talking about here? I haven't given them any results at all. In >fact, >I have had a hyperthreading CPU in my office for two days now and the only >result I have provided to anyone was what I provided here (SMT on = 1.33X SMT >off). Can you please post verbose outputs with for each ply also the number of nodes printed? That factor 9 times speedup of their own test is a bit much though :) Thanks, Vincent
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.