Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Interesting Game....:-)

Author: Roy Eassa

Date: 14:04:15 12/06/02

Go up one level in this thread


On December 02, 2002 at 20:58:20, Art Basham wrote:

>Fidelity Mach 3 vrs Gambit Tiger 2.0
> 1.h3 d5  2.d4 e6   3.Nf3 Nf6   4.e3 a6   5.Bd3 Bd6  0.00/8  0  6.0-0 Nc6
>-0.06/6  3  7.c3 Ne4  -0.28/7  6  8.Nbd2 f5  -0.42/7  4  9.Qb3 0-0  -0.44/6  3
>10.g3 Rf7  -0.64/6  9  11.c4 Nb4  -0.72/5  2  12.Ne5 Bxe5  -0.94/7  2  13.Qxb4
>Bd6  -0.68/8  0  14.c5 Be7  -0.68/7  1  15.Nf3 Rf6  -0.68/7  4  16.Qb3 Rh6
>-0.82/7  3  17.Kh2 Qe8  -0.98/7  6  18.Be2 g5  -1.32/7  11  19.Ng1 g4  -1.22/9
>0  20.f3 gxf3  -1.00/8  0  21.Nxf3 Qg6  -2.62/8  3  22.Rg1 Qg4  -2.72/8  5
>23.h4 Rg6  -2.98/8  0  24.Rg2 Nxg3  -2.38/8  1  25.Bd2 Bf6  -2.10/8  0  26.Qa4
>Kf8  -3.30/8  6  27.Rag1 Be5  -5.98/9  4  28.Be1 Nf1+  -24.62/9  3  29.Kh1 Qh3+
>-29.04/9  3  30.Rh2 Nxh2  -#52/4  0  31.Ng5 Rxg5  -#97/4  0  32.Qe8+ Kxe8  -#4/6
> 0  33.Bb5+ axb5  -#3/4  0  34.Bg3 Nf3+  -#2/7  0  35.Bh2 Rxg1# -#1/43  0  0-1
>
>I am doing this just for fun..to see what happens...:-)
>Art


White wasn't too badly off until the recapture 21.Nxf3?.  If instead it had
played 21.Bxf3, its disadvantantage would not have been more than 1/2 pawn IMHO.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.