Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: a difficult (?) R+B vs. R evaluation

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 20:16:13 12/07/02

Go up one level in this thread


On December 07, 2002 at 22:11:01, Mike S. wrote:

>In a WinBoard match game Delfi 3.2 - Crafty 18.15, the following position
>occured before the 92nd move, after Crafty allowed it's last pawn to be
>exchanged (maybe that was forced, though  don't think it was, didn't analyse
>it):
>[D]R7/3b1k2/8/6R1/4r2K/7P/3r2P1/8 w - - 0 92
>Crafty, but also other engines, evaluate that position with a *big* advantage
>for black, sometimes up to -2.x. No combination involved (the material balance
>didn't change the next 80 moves).

If Crafty says black is winning, something is broken as there is specific
code to handle that particular case (one side is a minor piece up but with
no pawns it has no chance of winning even if the opponent didn't have any
pawns left...

I'll look to see if I broke something...  although 18.15 might be old enough
that the fix was not in...




>
>4-piece tbs. + RB-R, RN-R were installed.
>
>I'd like to ask strong chessplayers especially, but also anybody else, if the
>following is correct:
>
>1. Since RB-R is a theoretical draw (with few exceptions), the value of the
>black bishop is *less* than usual here.
>2. White's pawns are connected passers and therefore *more* valuable than +2.
>3. Crafty knows the basic RB-R draw within it's algos (IIRC; I didn't check it
>now) and will evaluate it correctly even in the quiescence search.
>4. For these reasons, the position should be evaluated less (for Black) than the
>material balance, IOW between 0.00 and -1.00 (max.) if not with a white
>advantage even (White's pawns seem to be more dangerous than Black's bishop).
>
>Does the presence of the additional 2 rooks change the evaluation that much? We
>have RRPP vs. RRB. I wonder if something "anti human" in Crafty might be
>responsible for the too optimistic evaluation... Black has the potential to
>create mate threats still, easier than in RB-R.
>
>The game lasted until move no. 227 (!!) until it was finally drawn...
>
>Regards,
>M.Scheidl



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.