Author: stuart taylor
Date: 01:34:21 12/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 08, 2002 at 04:29:23, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On December 08, 2002 at 00:50:31, stuart taylor wrote: > >>If I keep with my AMD 1.4 (266) and the few top programs which I'll see about >>within the next 2-3 months. > >Withing the next three months you would NOT see much improvement over Deep Fritz >in (Comp vs Comp) > >>I wonder if I'll be missing much during the next few years. > >And over the next few years, you will NOT see much improvement over Fritz 8 in >Computer vs Humans either, except that Fritz 10 might play 50 Elo points >stronger when facing a human plus another 80 point by using a Xeon or MP which >is 4x stronger than what it was used against Kramnik. > > >>IF I hang out for a next generation Hammer computer, and the next generation of >>programs, if written with that in mind, will that give me a great plus over what >>I have (and intend to have) now? And that would take another year, If I'm lucky! >> Then I'll want the final hammer version, with the programs of then. That will be >>about 5 years from now, if lucky. And will THAT be so much greater? > >Yes of course, your bank account will be a few thousand dollars more if you save >that amount every time you think of buying a new computer just for chess, or a >few hundred dollars if you don't upgrade your system. :) > >Pichard Nice one! > >> >>Now, If what I want is greater insights into chess, OK so I occasionally allow >>up to 2 hours per move with what I (will) have. That is already more insight >>than the computer side of the recent Kramnik/DF match, and the upcoming >>Kasparov/DJ match. >> Can I be sure that in 5 years from now, things will look so much different in >>quality of computerchess? Actual quality of insight? >>S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.