Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: UCI - Worth Implementing?

Author: Daniel Clausen

Date: 08:46:34 12/08/02

Go up one level in this thread



On December 07, 2002 at 10:25:53, Joachim Rang wrote:

[...]

>I, like a customer,
>prefer UCI, becasue it's easier and quicker to change some values within the GUI
>instead of editing an Ini-File and restarting the engine.

I fail to see what the functionality a GUI offers (ie turning off nullmove,
switching opening books, you-name-it) has to do with the protocol between the
GUI and the engine.

The GUI could change the configuration file (.rc, .ini or whatever) and send the
engine a command to re-read the configuration file. Sounds pretty simple to me.
Or it could simple terminate the engine and start it again. (which has some
drawbacks, but is even simpler to implement as there is no command like
'REREAD_CONFIG' needed.

Just because no xboard/winboard-GUI does that, doesn't mean it's not possible to
do.

Sargon



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.