Author: stuart taylor
Date: 08:54:20 12/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 08, 2002 at 05:12:47, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 08, 2002 at 03:07:30, Helmut Conrady wrote: > >>On December 08, 2002 at 02:04:35, Sandro Necchi wrote: >> >>>On December 07, 2002 at 22:19:13, Tim Blankenship wrote: >>> >>>>havent heard but 1 or 2 things about it..is it suppose to be strong or does >>>>anyone know...thx >>> >>>My best guess for the new Shredder 7 is about 50 points stronger. I wrote this >>>in CCC. >>> >>>Talking with other testers I got this confirm by them, too, >> >>Yes, thats right, Sandro: >> >>E.g.:I have done a test match Fritz 8-Shredder 7 >> >>conditions: >> >>Fritz 8_GUI >>Athlon 1700+ >>50 games >>no TBs >>10´+4`´ >>Powerbooks 2002 (varietety of play: max; minimum of games: 10). >> >>29: 21 for Shredder (+23 -15 =12), = 58%. >> >>The other results are very impressive, too. After some hundred games Shredder 7 >>is within the 95%-margin stronger than Deep Fritz 7 >> >> >>I predict Shredder will top the next SSDF-list. >> >>Helmut > >I am interested to know the results of shredder in tactical test suites like the >GCP test suite. > >Is shredder better than other commercial programs in tactics? >Is it better than Ruffianor or Knightdreamer in solving the GCP test suite >(You can see results of knightdreamer in the knightdreamer homepage)? > >Uri 1).Is Shredder known to be weaker in tactics? 2).Is last version great in other things? 3). Is knightdreamer a great new engine? S.Taylor
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.