Author: Uri Blass
Date: 09:06:14 12/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 08, 2002 at 11:54:20, stuart taylor wrote: >On December 08, 2002 at 05:12:47, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On December 08, 2002 at 03:07:30, Helmut Conrady wrote: >> >>>On December 08, 2002 at 02:04:35, Sandro Necchi wrote: >>> >>>>On December 07, 2002 at 22:19:13, Tim Blankenship wrote: >>>> >>>>>havent heard but 1 or 2 things about it..is it suppose to be strong or does >>>>>anyone know...thx >>>> >>>>My best guess for the new Shredder 7 is about 50 points stronger. I wrote this >>>>in CCC. >>>> >>>>Talking with other testers I got this confirm by them, too, >>> >>>Yes, thats right, Sandro: >>> >>>E.g.:I have done a test match Fritz 8-Shredder 7 >>> >>>conditions: >>> >>>Fritz 8_GUI >>>Athlon 1700+ >>>50 games >>>no TBs >>>10´+4`´ >>>Powerbooks 2002 (varietety of play: max; minimum of games: 10). >>> >>>29: 21 for Shredder (+23 -15 =12), = 58%. >>> >>>The other results are very impressive, too. After some hundred games Shredder 7 >>>is within the 95%-margin stronger than Deep Fritz 7 >>> >>> >>>I predict Shredder will top the next SSDF-list. >>> >>>Helmut >> >>I am interested to know the results of shredder in tactical test suites like the >>GCP test suite. >> >>Is shredder better than other commercial programs in tactics? >>Is it better than Ruffianor or Knightdreamer in solving the GCP test suite >>(You can see results of knightdreamer in the knightdreamer homepage)? >> >>Uri > >1).Is Shredder known to be weaker in tactics? I do not know. >2).Is last version great in other things? I do not know. >3). Is knightdreamer a great new engine? knightdreamer is a good engine that is known to be good in tactics. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.