Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Importance of a transposition table

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 18:18:47 12/08/02

Go up one level in this thread

On December 08, 2002 at 13:40:55, Dieter Buerssner wrote:

>On December 08, 2002 at 12:58:53, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>I think that Crafty or yace are better than every engine without tranposition
>>table.
>
>Interesting comment. I wonder, how you came to this opinion. It may mean, that
>something in the transposition table implementation of my program goes really
>wrong.
>
>Regards,
>Dieter

I think that in endings, a non-transposition-table program will get out-searched
so badly it will lose almost every one.  Try fine-70 with and without to see
what
I mean, as a worst-case example...

• Re: Importance of a transposition table Uri Blass 03:41:25 12/09/02
  • Re: Importance of a transposition table Robert Hyatt 06:55:50 12/09/02
    • Re: Importance of a transposition table Dieter Buerssner 08:15:35 12/09/02
      • Re: Importance of a transposition table Daniel Clausen 09:28:06 12/10/02
        • Re: Importance of a transposition table Heiner Marxen 10:43:03 12/10/02
        • Re: Importance of a transposition table Uri Blass 10:13:43 12/10/02
    • Re: Importance of a transposition table Uri Blass 07:11:10 12/09/02
      • Re: Importance of a transposition table(26 and not 23 plies) Uri Blass 09:13:21 12/09/02
        • Re: Importance of a transposition table(26 and not 23 plies) Robert Hyatt 21:34:19 12/09/02
        • Re: Importance of a transposition table(26 and not 23 plies) Robert Hyatt 21:33:00 12/09/02

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.