Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 18:20:35 12/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 08, 2002 at 15:01:02, Andrew Williams wrote: >On December 08, 2002 at 14:33:52, Matthias Gemuh wrote: > >>> >>>I do not know commercial engines well. Is it possible to let them run without >>>transposition tables? How could one know it? For my engine, it would not be >>>difficult, to still use a small transposition table, when the user gives "hash >>>0". But it won't. It would probably not be easy to detect. >>> >>>Regards, >>>Dieter >> >> >>My BigLion will not even run without transformation tables because it uses the >>table to hash its move lists. This is a clear indication that BigLion is more of >>a joke than of a serious chess program. >> >>/Matthias. > >I don't see why! My program needs at least one TT entry to run properly. > >Andrew Crafty has a minimum size too. I depend on this for move ordering from one iteration to the next and don't allow zero entries at all, nor do I allow just one. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.