Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Positional Test(analysis by yace only material)

Author: Ingo Lindam

Date: 14:43:35 12/10/02

Go up one level in this thread


On December 10, 2002 at 17:04:07, Uri Blass wrote:

>Yace only material with the following values claims that it is tactics.
>pawn=0.8
>knigh=3.4
>bishop=3.5
>rook=5
>queen=10.01
>
>New position
>[D]rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/3P4/2PNPP2/P1NBB2P/1P3QP1/3R1RK1 w kq - 0 1
>
>Analysis by yace_mo:
>
>1.d6 exd6
>  µ  (-0.80)   Depth: 1   00:00:05
>1.f5
>  =  (0.00)   Depth: 1   00:00:05
>1.f5 Nh6
>  =  (0.00)   Depth: 2   00:00:05
>1.f5 Nh6 2.Qd2
>  =  (0.00)   Depth: 3   00:00:05
>1.f5 Nh6 2.Qd2 a5
>  =  (0.00)   Depth: 4   00:00:05
>1.f5 Nh6 2.Qd2 a5 3.Ndb5
>  =  (0.00)   Depth: 5   00:00:05  4kN
>1.f5 Nh6 2.Qd2 a5 3.Ndb5 b6
>  =  (0.00)   Depth: 6   00:00:05  13kN
>1.f5 Nh6 2.Qd2 a5 3.Ndb5 b6 4.Bf2
>  =  (0.00)   Depth: 7   00:00:06  37kN
>1.f5 Nh6 2.Qd2 a5 3.Ndb5 b6 4.Bf2 g6
>  =  (0.00)   Depth: 8   00:00:06  132kN
>1.f5 Nh6 2.Qd2 a5 3.Ndb5 b6 4.Bf2 g6 5.fxg6
>  =  (0.00)   Depth: 9   00:00:06  438kN
>1.f5 Nh6 2.Qd2 a5 3.Ndb5 b6 4.Bf2 g6 5.fxg6 hxg6
>  =  (0.00)   Depth: 10   00:00:07  934kN
>1.f5 Nh6 2.Qd2 a5 3.Ndb5 b6 4.Bf2 g6 5.fxg6 hxg6 6.Be2 d6
>  =  (0.00)   Depth: 11   00:00:11  3609kN
>1.f5 d6 2.Be2 Nf6 3.e5 dxe5 4.Ne6 fxe6 5.dxe6 Nbd7 6.exd7+ Bxd7 7.Bxa7 Kf7
>  =  (0.00)   Depth: 12   00:00:57  28599kN
>1.e5 b6 2.e6 fxe6 3.dxe6 dxe6 4.Nf3 Nd7 5.Qg3 Nh6 6.Bg6+ hxg6 7.Qxg6+ Nf7 8.Ng5
>Nde5 9.Rxd8+ Kxd8
>  =  (0.01)   Depth: 12   00:02:14  71742kN
>1.e5 b6 2.e6 Nh6 3.exf7+ Nxf7 4.Qc2 g6 5.Qa4 Bb7 6.Ne6 Qc8 7.Nxf8
>  =  (0.10)   Depth: 12   00:02:54  94557kN
>1.e5 b6 2.e6 Nh6 3.f5 Bb7 4.Bxh6 gxh6 5.exf7+ Kxf7 6.Ne6 Qc8 7.f6 dxe6 8.fxe7+
>Ke8 9.exf8Q+ Kd7
>  ²  (0.50)   Depth: 13   00:05:46  193739kN
>1.e5 b6 2.e6 Nh6 3.f5 c5 4.dxc6 dxc6 5.exf7+
>  ±  (0.80)   Depth: 13   00:09:33  324089kN
>
>(blass, tel-aviv 11.12.2002)
>
>Uri

It shouldn't be surprising that a position offering a positional advantage
contains also tactical possibilities... and also a tactical proof of the
advantage if one is just able to look deep enough into the position/searchtree
to find that proof, should it?

I guess it doesn't surprise you, Uri.

Internette Gruesse,
Ingo




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.