Author: Uri Blass
Date: 15:52:57 12/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 10, 2002 at 18:27:03, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On December 10, 2002 at 12:46:23, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On December 10, 2002 at 12:19:25, Nicolas GUIBERT wrote: >> >>> >>>>I believe that 200 lines are not enough to have a top program but 2000 lines >>>>with the right knowledge and good search algorithm may be enough. >>>> >>>>It may be interesting to know how many lines do programs like >>>>Junior or Ruffian have. >>>> >>> >>>I probably have the same opinion as Vincent on this subject. Evaluation is >>>extremely important and very often one single line does the same as 30-40 plies >>>of search... >>> >>>The thing is also that when you know a lot about the game yourself you can't >>>stand seeing your program play a stupid move because it does not understand >>>something... And then you write down the thing on your to-do list... And finally >>>implement the necessary thing... >> >>I know about chess more than other games. >>I know about chess better than most programmers(my rating is close to 2000) > >you mean your correspondence rating? No over the board rating and it is probably the last time that I answer your posts. > >So not a national rating based upon 40 in 2 games. > >or are you just guessing here like Ed Schroeder used to do, >guessing himself at 2000 national though i estimate him at 1300 >national. You always like to say bad things about other people and I bnever heard you apologize about them. My Israeli rating(over the board) that is eqvivalent to fide rating is more than 2000. > >So is this just like me guessing my draughts rating is 1600? > >Your chess comments here make me believe you are more like a 1400. You can believe what you want. I am not going to continue this discussion. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.