Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: another assumption

Author: Sune Fischer

Date: 09:32:42 12/12/02

Go up one level in this thread


On December 12, 2002 at 11:27:37, Uri Blass wrote:

>>>Of course it is a bit unfair to give the movei only 2 years to
>>>implement 2000 lines of code to improve his evaluation, but
>>>well 2000 lines of evaluation for a chess program i
>>>could possibly write within a week.
>>
>>Well, I would love to take that bet, but I can't promise Movei only has 2000
>>lines of eval in 2004 :(
>>Once you start adding it grows rapidly.
>
>I do not want to take that bet.
>I also did not say that I can do it but only that it is possible.

Yes I think you are right, realisticly speaking. Maybe I should take the bet on
my own program instead then ;)

If Vincent promises not to work on anything but the evaluation for two years, I
think I could I beat him. Only problem is I don't have two years full time to
spend on it. It would be more like 4 months full time spread over two years,
that is not enough I think :(

>I believe that a combination of a programmer who is better than me and my ideas
>can do it.

Take some classes in programming, read some books. You can learn. :)

>I also see that there is a disagreement about the definition of the size of the
>evaluation.

What do you mean?

-S.

>Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.