Author: Uri Blass
Date: 09:35:58 12/12/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 12, 2002 at 12:32:42, Sune Fischer wrote: >On December 12, 2002 at 11:27:37, Uri Blass wrote: > >>>>Of course it is a bit unfair to give the movei only 2 years to >>>>implement 2000 lines of code to improve his evaluation, but >>>>well 2000 lines of evaluation for a chess program i >>>>could possibly write within a week. >>> >>>Well, I would love to take that bet, but I can't promise Movei only has 2000 >>>lines of eval in 2004 :( >>>Once you start adding it grows rapidly. >> >>I do not want to take that bet. >>I also did not say that I can do it but only that it is possible. > >Yes I think you are right, realisticly speaking. Maybe I should take the bet on >my own program instead then ;) > >If Vincent promises not to work on anything but the evaluation for two years, I >think I could I beat him. Only problem is I don't have two years full time to >spend on it. It would be more like 4 months full time spread over two years, >that is not enough I think :( > >>I believe that a combination of a programmer who is better than me and my ideas >>can do it. > >Take some classes in programming, read some books. You can learn. :) > >>I also see that there is a disagreement about the definition of the size of the >>evaluation. > >What do you mean? See my reply to vincent. For example I do not consider piece square tables that are used by the evaluation as part of the evaluation because they are calculated at the beginning of the game and not during the game. Uri Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.