Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Label the Craftys on ICC

Author: Will Singleton

Date: 11:10:17 09/18/98

Go up one level in this thread



On September 18, 1998 at 00:31:44, James B. Shearer wrote:

>     I play a lot on ICC and I like the fact that there are always crafty clones
>available to play.  I would not like to see them limited.
>


There are many Craftys available to play on the server at all times.  Limiting
the number of clones wouldn't affect your ability to play them at all.  It would
instead have the effect of increasing the visibility and playing time of those
that remain.


>     As for the authors of other programs, instead of complaining about crafty
>clones why not match your program against them.  Also a weak program like
>amateur will naturally be of less interest to the strongest players.  Btw why
>not allow amateur to play bullet games if you want more games?


I would have preferred that you had said "weaker" rather than "weak". ;-)
Certainly Amateur is weaker than Crafty, but there are few that aren't.  And my
current blitz rating of 2392 isn't exactly peanuts.  There are quite a few
programs by folks on this board with lower ICC ratings, incl the current Aussie
National Champ.  So watch it with the "weak" stuff.

Amateur doesn't play bullet because it doesn't have timestamp.  No mac engine
interface has timestamp, although I'm currently hacking Fixation with that goal
in mind.

Will (don't mess with my baby mode)

ps.  What's your ICC handle and rating?  Are you a programmer?




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.