Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 08:17:42 12/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 13, 2002 at 04:15:41, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On December 12, 2002 at 19:03:58, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On December 12, 2002 at 14:01:55, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>[D]rnbq1k1r/1p1nb3/p2pp2p/6PQ/4P2B/2N5/PPP3PP/R3KB1R w KQ - 0 13 >>> >>>From Tim Krabbe's site: Bb5! >>> >>>-- >>>GCP >> >> >>How can this be called "positional"??? >> >>The first move is tactical (hanging a piece). > >The 'tactical' refutation for taking it is like 3 ply. You >aren't going to play it unless you see the positional issues >that are going on. > >-- >GCP Seeing that after Bb5, if black takes the bishop bad things happen is only a _small_ part of this position. There are all kinds of tactical issues that have to be resolved, which means it isn't a "positional" problem until all the tactics are worked out...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.