Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Book is good. Only complaining about the abundance of redundance.

Author: Arshad Syed

Date: 19:24:23 12/13/02

Go up one level in this thread


On December 13, 2002 at 21:31:04, Russell Reagan wrote:

>On December 13, 2002 at 20:55:59, Arshad F. Syed wrote:
>
>>I just purchased the book 'Scaleable Search in Computer Chess'. It starts off
>>well giving a good overview of the main topics and advances in modern CC, but it
>>falters badly towards the end.
>
>As far as I know, Dr. Heinz is one of the only people to even attempt such a
>book. I am reminded of how people "in the industry" bashed a book called Tricks
>of the Game Programming Gurus (and it's sequel Tricks of the Windows Game
>Programming Gurus). It talked about doing graphics and input and sound and all
>of that good stuff in real mode DOS, covered line drawing algorithms, some AI,
>some 3D stuff, a little bit of everything that goes into most games. It was of
>incredible help to a countless number of beginning programmers who wanted to
>make games, but people "in the know" seemed to think it was rather amateurish.
>The point is, no one else had even attempted such a book at the time.
>
>>As if that was not enough, the price is at a premium - $55 for approx. 300
>>pages.
>
>Hmmm...mine cost $40 new at barnesandnoble.com.
>
>>Hopefully, some day the GOM (Grand Old Man) of Computer Chess, Dr. Hyatt,
>>comes out with something of his own. Here is what I would like to see:
>
>I agree. I'm sure he has a ton of good book material, whether it be techincal or
>simply good stories or the history of computer chess.
>
>>All major topics covered - Alpha-Beta, Trans. Tables, the whole 9 yards.
>>Introduction to AI - specifically machine learning as applied to Chess.
>>Advanced programming recommendations as applied to chess - multi-threading,
>>multi-processing etc.
>
>So, you want something Knuth-like, only on the topic of computer chess. Me too
>:)
>
>Russell


I appreciate Dr. Heinz's effort. I didn't mean to criticize the book, just the
pages wasted on what in 'my view' was redundant material, which would be more
appropriate in a thesis. I could be wrong. This is just 'my opinion'.

Regards,
Arshad



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.