Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: about ignorance

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 13:29:39 09/18/98

Go up one level in this thread


On September 18, 1998 at 16:11:25, Moritz Berger wrote:

ok - my name is thorsten czub. If you click in the about box of cstal,
you will find my name in the box under the advisor-line or whatever...
so i should know better about the program.

>I downloaded the version I use about one week ago from www.oxford-softworks.com

the version on the server is broken. it is the wrong version.
the programmers who have put this version on the oxford server normally program
gomuku and bridge and go programs. They don't know about cstal.
they have to fight with chris' children, his chickens, the cats and the dog,
the temperatures (hot in summer, cold and windy in winter) and they drink tea
the whole day.
Die haben also keine Ahnung.
Of course you can say: oh - this is the actual version of the server. I will use
it.

But the serial number of this version (you say it yourself, 284a) is older than
289. From this number you can see that the version 289 (that was on the server a
while ago) is the later version.
I have no idea why somebody put the broken version on the server.
I can only imagine that the programmers in chris office are complete-idiots not
knowing what they do.

My question now is: if THEY behave like idiots, why do you have to make the same
mistake and test a version that is broken ?
Although i have told you many times. in public. and even send you the 289
version.
And you still test the wrong ?!
Aha. ok - fritz5 has to play against caissa in this seventh round. i will not
let fritz 5.03 play, but fritz1.
I have once bought it from chessBase.

>Today is September 18th. I use the "Paris" version that is available on the
>server today.

right . you use the broken version.

>I also invited you to play the Nunn test on your machines, with any version you
>chose. Why do you continue to attack me here?

Why should i do a stupid test ? that would be time wasting, wouldn't it ?

where did i "continue" to attack you ?

I just wonder why somebody who has a mind to think and eyes to read and
email-adress and the right version (289) still is willingly NOT testing it, and
instead uses a broken version.

This was all discussed months ago in rgcc and there chris posted that the
programmer in charge for putting the versions on the server is an idiot or
something like this. But this does not impress you anyway. If the traffic light
is red, you die in your VW-Polo behind it, as long as somebody will make it
green for you... as a brave german follwing LAWS/RULES and not doing what is
forbidden, forbidden, forbidden.

Manche verhungern eben hinter einer roten Ampel.
Typisch.


>
>
>Kind regards
>
>Moritz



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.