Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:16:27 12/15/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 15, 2002 at 04:55:28, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On December 14, 2002 at 21:13:23, Omid David Tabibi wrote: > >>[D] 8/4k3/8/1p2p2p/1P2P2P/1P2P2P/1P2K2P/8 w - - 0 1 >> >>Fritz 7 immediately gives the score 0.00, ChessTiger 14 gives +3.86. How does >>ChessTiger 15 evaluate this position? > >If you want to judge endgame strength, it's probably more relevant to choose >positions that can be lost through stupidity or won through ingenuity instead of >focusing on the exact score. > >Regards, >Mogens I can add that not all the endgames are fortress positions so knowing better to detect fortress positions does not mean that the program is better in pawn endgames. Even if the question is statical score I can give other test positions. Can your program see by static score that the white pawns are unstoppable by the black king in the first case when they can be stopped in the second case? An array 64*64*64 can be enough to give you all the information but I did not build that array and I do not know if there is a program that use that array. [D]3k4/ppp5/8/8/4P2P/8/8/3K4 w - - 0 1 [D]3k4/ppp5/8/8/7P/8/4P3/3K4 w - - 0 1 Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.