Author: Amir Ban
Date: 15:40:25 09/18/98
Go up one level in this thread
On September 18, 1998 at 15:56:18, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On September 18, 1998 at 08:10:55, Guido Schimmels wrote: > >>In the very same article Nunn is citated as not even having turned on the >>computer when he selected the positions. He just put together a few >>positions he found interesting, he said. >>Thorsten, do you want to say Nunn did lie in this respect ? > >no. >but he is a special friend of fred for years, using chessBase stuff even in the >old atari times, visiting fred at his home as a frequently guest. > >Why do you suppose he is a liar ? I never said something like this. >I said that nunn is/was at the point of no return. Reading what you said (you snipped it, so I quote it again below), I think anyone who reads this will conclude not only that you are calling Nunn a liar, but calling Friedel a liar too, and accusing Nunn and Friedel of an evil conspiracy. You also say something, in another post, something like "no return" which sounds like a judgement of Dr. Nunn's mental health. Amir P.S. Here's what you said: >there is NO excuse for the nunn-test. >the nunn test was, so says css itself, done by nunn for css. he has done it >specially for his friend frederic. >frederic is owner of chessBase. > >it is the same when the owner of malboro asks a special cancer-doctor to write >an article about smoking not beeing dangerous. > >you now quote anywhere that smoking is not dangerous because john nunn has said >this. > >and frederic paid for this... brilliant.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.