Author: John Merlino
Date: 10:19:57 12/15/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 14, 2002 at 18:11:19, GuyHaworth wrote: > >Excellent work by Marc, both in trailblazing on 6-man P-endgames and in being >alive to the 'KNNK' problem as flagged up by one or more endgame studies. > >Sympathies to anyone, including Marc, who is having to redo a fair bit of work. > >I am not clear whether: > >- all 'maxDTM = 1' situations create the bug, and >- all these situations have been covered, and >- whether it is now asserted that FEG is bug-free > >A verification check independent of the original generation code is the best >confirmation that all is ok. Where Eugene's tables are available, a serial scan >of FEG checking against EN's results would be adequate, as EN's EGTs have been >verified. > >g To answer your questions: - all 'maxDTM = 1' situations were affected by the bug, - all of them by the same single bug, - existence of other bugs has not been proven, yet. :-) jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.