Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 07:03:25 12/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 16, 2002 at 09:33:55, Dan Andersson wrote: >It's not that simple. In every case there is complex reasons for any decision. >While it is true that the bottom line is money. In this case the P4 design is >having trouble scaling in frequency. They designed it for speed and hoped that >the much older Athlon design would not scale as it has done. And Intel sees the >x86 as a dead end. The research and design costs would be prohibitive if they >launched a crash program. Better to wait on AMD and try a broad range of >possible improvements. > >MvH Dan Andersson A california based chip giant has produced this chip. http://www.siliconstrategies.com/story/OEG20001211S0006 http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,36348,00.asp
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.