Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 07:46:55 12/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 16, 2002 at 09:33:55, Dan Andersson wrote: >It's not that simple. In every case there is complex reasons for any decision. >While it is true that the bottom line is money. In this case the P4 design is >having trouble scaling in frequency. > > >MvH Dan Andersson You are right Intel is reaching a dead end road with the P4 it took them 2 years to increase the speed from P4 1.5 Ghz to P4 3Ghz. But the upcoming technology will be based on the true Pentium V (Remember what Pentium stand for) :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.