Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 08:29:22 12/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 16, 2002 at 10:46:55, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On December 16, 2002 at 09:33:55, Dan Andersson wrote: > >>It's not that simple. In every case there is complex reasons for any decision. >>While it is true that the bottom line is money. In this case the P4 design is >>having trouble scaling in frequency. >> >> >>MvH Dan Andersson > >You are right Intel is reaching a dead end road with the P4 it took them 2 years >to increase the speed from P4 1.5 Ghz to P4 3Ghz. But the upcoming technology >will be based on the true Pentium V (Remember what Pentium stand for) :) That is a normal rate of improvement. Doubling every two years.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.