Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: SURPRISING RESULTS P4 Xeon dual 2.8Ghz

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 09:09:22 12/17/02

Go up one level in this thread


On December 17, 2002 at 12:03:38, Matt Taylor wrote:

>Actually I based it on data that Dr. Hyatt posted previously. The data Vincent
>has for his program doesn't show such wonderful gains.

Ok - first see my above post; I looked at the wrong log. I don't
have data for this exact comparison yet, so you may be right - or not.

I don't trust any data that is produced by either of the two
so I prefer to run my own tests.

>>>but it's been optimized for HT.
>>
>>It's not - even Robert will tell you this.
>
>Ok, it's been optimized for Pentium 4, which is -almost- the same thing. If it
>runs well on P4, it runs well with HT because it will fall into an I/O burst
>cycle.

Can you explain this last sentence?

--
GCP



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.