Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 09:11:34 12/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 17, 2002 at 12:05:19, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On December 17, 2002 at 11:58:21, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On December 17, 2002 at 11:27:18, Matt Taylor wrote: >> >>>Crafty gets better results with HT, >> >>In addition to what Vincent said, the data we currently >>have is saying exactly the opposite. > >Gah - forget I said this. I was looking at the wrong logfile. > >I don't have data for Crafty and Diep for a 2 CPU without and >4 CPU with hyperthreading setup yet. yes there is a test done diep without 2 cpu's and without HT. In diep's log i always write down the number of cpu's it's tested at. (2) means 2 cpu's. for crafty there is indeed no log yet of 2 cpu's without versus 2 cpu's with HT. I gave you that 18.15 version which prints out exact node counts for crafty (possibly it could print out only a wrong number when it splits in the root which provable is not possible when it is still searching the first rootmove, but at the first PV and the end of a ply it will print out the correct number of nodes as one can proof easily). Best regards, Vincent >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.