Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 10:19:06 12/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 17, 2002 at 12:03:38, Matt Taylor wrote: >On December 17, 2002 at 11:58:21, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On December 17, 2002 at 11:27:18, Matt Taylor wrote: >> >>>Crafty gets better results with HT, >> >>In addition to what Vincent said, the data we currently >>have is saying exactly the opposite. >> >>So I'd like to know what you based that statement on. >> >>Magic 8-ball? > >Actually I based it on data that Dr. Hyatt posted previously. The data Vincent >has for his program doesn't show such wonderful gains. That's nice. It's not >representative of everything, and it's not even conclusive. Truth is, Vincent's >data doesn't show jack. You need multiple tests and multiple machines to show >anything conclusively. > >>>but it's been optimized for HT. >> >>It's not - even Robert will tell you this. > >Ok, it's been optimized for Pentium 4, which is -almost- the same thing. If it >runs well on P4, it runs well with HT because it will fall into an I/O burst >cycle. He has stated a number of times that his interests are in the P4 because >he has one on his desk. Eugene's interests are obviously in the P4. It's not >rocket science to figure out what that means. Actually you were right. You might have noticed the inline assembly thread I started a couple of weeks ago when I was working on the "pause" issue... > >-Matt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.