Author: bobby palacios
Date: 06:24:29 12/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 18, 2002 at 05:31:25, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 18, 2002 at 04:59:21, ludicrous wrote: > >>Would anyone say that Crafty of today is better than Genius 3 of yesterday that >>beat Kasparov et al? Genius played on a slow computer, and yet managed to score >>against Kasparov. Would anyone think that Crafty 19.01 with Athlon can beat, if >>not easily, Genius 3 with slow hardware? >> >>Then if Crafty is better, then would it be safe to say that Crafty is of GM >>strength? > >I do not say that crafty is not of GM strength but you cannot decide that it is >at GM strength only because of the fact that it is better than genius on slow >hardware. > >We have no proof that genius at slow hardware is GM strength. > >The games of genius against kasparov were fast time control and we also cannot >compare kasparov of 1994 with players of today and it is possible that today >GM's play better(I do not say it and it is only one possibility) > >Uri Add to the fact, that Kasparov in 1994 was playing "normal" chess not anti-computer chess, and trying to beat the computer at its own game.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.