Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: Proving something is better

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 08:23:38 12/18/02

Go up one level in this thread

On December 18, 2002 at 11:15:01, Omid David Tabibi wrote:

>I further don't understand why all the fire is directed at me; fixed depth
>comparisons are the common accepted comparison methods, which are completely
>hardware independant.
>For the most recent examples take a look at Heinz and Plaat's numerous >articles, all of which were conducted in fixed depth.

I would think that the best research is the one that improves upon
the mistakes of previous ones.


This page took 0.04 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.