Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: Proving something is better

Author: Omid David Tabibi

Date: 08:29:37 12/18/02

Go up one level in this thread

On December 18, 2002 at 11:23:38, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>On December 18, 2002 at 11:15:01, Omid David Tabibi wrote:
>>I further don't understand why all the fire is directed at me; fixed depth
>>comparisons are the common accepted comparison methods, which are completely
>>hardware independant.
>>For the most recent examples take a look at Heinz and Plaat's numerous >articles, all of which were conducted in fixed depth.
>I would think that the best research is the one that improves upon
>the mistakes of previous ones.

I am yet to be convinced that the methodology practiced by Hyatt, Schaeffer,
Marsland, Buro, Plaat, Heinz, and others, is mistake.


This page took 0.03 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.