Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Proving something is better

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 10:47:41 12/18/02

On December 18, 2002 at 13:10:09, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>Time by itself is also misleading.
>
>It would not be hard to search the PV quickly and then bog down on refuting
>the rest of the moves, which would allow time-only to produce a false
>impression.

How is this going to give you faster times exactly?

--
GCP

Re: Proving something is better Robert Hyatt 11:47:00 12/18/02
- Re: Proving something is better Bruce Moreland 12:41:11 12/18/02
  - Re: Proving something is better Robert Hyatt 13:20:16 12/18/02
    - Re: Proving something is better Bruce Moreland 14:18:56 12/18/02
      - Re: Proving something is better Robert Hyatt 19:43:45 12/18/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Bruce Moreland 20:24:08 12/18/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Robert Hyatt 08:19:08 12/19/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Omid David Tabibi 21:58:30 12/18/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Bruce Moreland 23:35:47 12/18/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Rémi Coulom 01:48:45 12/20/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Peter Fendrich 16:28:01 12/19/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Rémi Coulom 01:10:35 12/20/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Peter Fendrich 08:03:14 12/20/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Rémi Coulom 11:20:22 12/20/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Peter Fendrich 16:31:37 12/20/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Uri Blass 09:16:25 12/20/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Peter Fendrich 16:07:04 12/20/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Uri Blass 16:30:38 12/20/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Peter Fendrich 16:56:58 12/20/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Uri Blass 17:01:17 12/20/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Peter Fendrich 13:39:01 12/21/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Uri Blass 13:51:59 12/21/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Peter Fendrich 15:18:43 12/21/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Rémi Coulom 04:48:37 12/22/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Peter Fendrich 03:31:57 12/23/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Rémi Coulom 06:10:59 12/23/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Peter Fendrich 09:14:57 12/23/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Peter Fendrich 06:41:17 12/27/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Rémi Coulom 12:03:29 12/28/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Peter Fendrich 07:27:37 01/02/03
        
        Re: Proving something is better Uri Blass 04:04:45 12/24/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Peter Fendrich 05:59:19 12/27/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Peter Fendrich 13:45:57 12/21/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Uri Blass 13:57:44 12/21/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Dieter Buerssner 14:22:35 12/19/02
        
        Re: Proving something is better Omid David Tabibi 20:29:27 12/18/02
    - Re: Proving something is better Brian Richardson 13:42:33 12/18/02
      - Re: Proving something is better Uri Blass 14:24:12 12/18/02

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.