Author: Martin Giepmans
Date: 18:19:47 12/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 18, 2002 at 20:42:09, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >On December 18, 2002 at 20:34:58, Martin Giepmans wrote: > >><snip> >>>The tactical strength is not affected by the re-searches. They merely help >avoid >>>zugzwangs. >> >>This is not true, Omid. >>Nullmove pruning often overlooks tactical (and positional) threats >>that are not related to zugzwang. Because of that some programmers use >>(standard) verification search in every phase of the game. >> > >The major improvement comes from the continued search after a fail-high report, >which detects tactical errors beyond the horizon of the original null-move >search. Re-searches can also contribute to enhancing the middlegame tactical >performance, but that additional improvement is usually negligible. > >>Cheers, >>Martin I don't understand what you are trying to say. Without a research (if the verification search with reduced depth doesn't give a cutoff) verification search would be pointless. How could research result in a "negligible" improvement? There is no other potential improvement ... Martin
This page took 0.04 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.