Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: Proving something is better

Author: Andrew Dados

Date: 19:08:38 12/18/02

Go up one level in this thread

On December 18, 2002 at 22:00:08, Omid David Tabibi wrote:

>On December 18, 2002 at 21:48:03, Andrew Dados wrote:
>>On December 18, 2002 at 18:56:21, Omid David Tabibi wrote:
>>>On December 18, 2002 at 18:12:22, Bruce Moreland wrote:
>>>>On December 18, 2002 at 16:59:10, Omid David Tabibi wrote:
>>>>>You take two numbers and draw a very general conclusion. Look at other tables
>>>>>and depths, which show a more significant superiority of std R=2 over std R=3.
>>>>>Look at Tables 2 and 6. Vrfd R=3 solved almost the same number of positions as
>>>>>std R=1 !!! Does it leave any room for doubt as for vrfd R=3's superiority over
>>>>>std R=3 ?
>>>>I don't see anything that shows demonstrated superiority of R=2 over R=3.  You
>>>>say to look at table 2 -- so do I.  It shows that R=2 gets one more correct
>>>>through ply 10, but take

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.