Author: Moritz Berger
Date: 10:11:06 09/19/98
Go up one level in this thread
On September 19, 1998 at 10:33:33, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On September 18, 1998 at 21:16:59, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >>This is the mirror image of the Fritz book discussion. > >right. but with a big difference: > >a) if somebody from chessBase would sent me an upgrade for my tournament, i >would of course use this upgrade... >b) moritz HAS the cstblack, he posted this in this newsgroup. >c) he is testing it although officials from oxford softworks complained about >him using it. Nobody except you complained about the fact that I used the most recent (and officially recommended as in "testers should certainly use this") version from www.oxford-softworks.com. You did never mention that you were speaking on behalf of Oxford Softworks as an "official" (you wrote "officials", could you elaborate on the plural, please?) of this company. You only mentioned that your name was in the "about" box of CST, but I didn't realize that you had the authority as a representative of Oxford softworks to make "official" statements on behalf of that company. It didn't sound like this when you were talking about chicken, dogs, etc. I want to clarify that I did not receive any email or fax or phone call from Oxford Softworks at least during the last couple of months. > >When I got a complained of participants in my tournament, i reacted. >He refuses to do so. This is not true, I did only refuse to stop testing the "official" version. I even mentioned that I might test the beta version (cstblack) as well after I'm finished with the other one. I invited you to play your own Nunn matches. Kind regards Moritz
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.