Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why CSTal

Author: Fernando Villegas

Date: 11:21:52 09/19/98

Go up one level in this thread


Hi Thorsten:
What you say worry me a little. I was already waiting W98 CSTAl version and now
you say you are not going to do it because of all that complainning people. Why
you bother with complaining people? The same you say nobody is coerced to use
upgrades, you are not coerced to read and give credit to each unfair or
unpleasant commentary anybody expel. I think Chris and you have some
responsabilities to people like me that has been supportive all the time to
CSTAL. I am sure for each guy blaming CSTAL, there are ten or a hundred that
does not write a word but are perfectly happy with CSTAL. I would like them can
get a win version, all upgrades, etc, and not just a handful of people more or
less acquanted with Chris os known by him, etc. CSTAL is great. The more I play
againts it, the more I love it and understand his different approach base in
"putting pressure" and not just in looking the theretical best move according to
the code source. That's the way ches is played! Chess is not a puzzle exercize,
is fight, is calculus inside a fight, is a a contest, a matter of time, of
dangers, threats, nerves, speculation, bluff, etc. And I want better and better
incarnations of that idea. It is only a pity that sometime Chris seems to be the
worst enemy of his own work. What happened in his site is a show of it, he let
his side to be mauled from broadsides all around. I would like he had a bit of
the attitude of Ed Schroeder in the sense not to ruin his crearture because an
oblivion, a mistake here, a wrong upgrade there. It is about that I tried to
write in that post where unfortunately my wording resulte too much harsh and
unexact. Well, enough... Keep on the work, Thorsten thinking in me :-)
Fernando



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.