Author: Bob Durrett
Date: 17:51:14 12/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 18, 2002 at 16:18:12, Stuart Smith wrote: >On December 17, 2002 at 19:04:58, Anson T J wrote: > >>Its probably trying to use too much Hash... Reduce the hash table size to 512MB >>then try to analyse a position. >> >>Increase the Hash table with small increments (64-128 MB) up to abt 768 MB and >>see how things go. If other programs are using your ram, trying 800MB + is too >>much for Fritz to have for itself. > >Reducing the Hash Table size seems to cure the problem - only issue now is that >I have to do this every time I run Fritz 8 even though the value is set to, say, >256Mb I have to rest it to 256Mb and click OK before it works. > >Is there an English Tech Support site for Fritz 8? > >Thanks to all who replied. Your's is an interesting data point. It makes you wonder whether or not RDRAM is a terrible choice for a chess computer. The main question it raises, however, is: "How much difference is there between Fritz 8 and Crafty v18.11?" The Crafty v18.11 Benchmark may not be representative at all when predicting Fritz 8 Kn/s. We need Fritz 8 data versus computer configurations. Bob D.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.